Claim of Bettcher v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

255 A.D. 734, 6 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4950
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 21, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The State Industrial Board has made findings that claimant contracted a right inguinal hernia as an occupational disease, arising from the nature of his employment, which necessitated the continuous lifting and carrying of heavy objects, weighing approximately 150 to 156 pounds, and from the fact that he was subjected to constant strain from such lifting. A physician testifies as to causal relation: “ Q. In your opinion, could the condition which he has, be brought about as the result of the work which he had been doing, assuming, of course, that he did not have any hernia there before he went to work there? * * * A. Yes, I think it would. I understand he followed this over a period of about sixteen months.” Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Hefllernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Bettcher v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 255 A.D. 734, 6 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 734 (Claim of Bettcher v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.
132 N.E.2d 840 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
Claim of Paradiso v. Vuozzo
277 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)