Claim of Bellotti v. Salvio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Bellotti v. Salvio

281 A.D. 722, 117 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3349

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 722 (Claim of Bellotti v. Salvio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Bellotti v. Salvio, 281 A.D. 722, 117 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The appellants contend that the claimant was not employed by, or working for, the employer at the time of the accident and that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of claimant’s employment. The board found that the claimant was employed as a handy man in the employer’s bar and restaurant and that he was injured in the course of his employment, while investigating a noise in the chicken coop in the rear of the restaurant. There is ample evidence to sustain the board’s findings. Award and decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Halpern, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 929.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The appellants contend that the claimant was not employed by, or working for, the employer at the time of the accident and that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of claimant’s employment. The board found that the claimant was employed as a handy man in the employer’s bar and restaurant and that he was injured in the course of his employment, while investigating a noise in the chicken coop in the rear of the restaurant. There is ample evidence to sustain the board’s findings. Award and decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Halpern, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 929.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 722, 117 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-bellotti-v-salvio-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack