Claim of Bederman v. McNamara
This text of 243 A.D. 661 (Claim of Bederman v. McNamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant was a window cleaner, employed by one Silverman; Silverman, in turn, contracted with McNamara to clean the windows of a school building of which McNamara was the custodian, and which McNamara was required to clean; Silverman had no insurance; McNamara had insurance covering the identical work which claimant was required to do. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-bederman-v-mcnamara-nyappdiv-1935.