Claim of Bederman v. McNamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Bederman v. McNamara

243 A.D. 661

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Claimant was a window cleaner, employed by one Silverman; Silverman, in turn, contracted with McNamara to clean the windows of a school building of which McNamara was the custodian, and which McNamara was required to clean; Silverman had no insurance; McNamara had insurance covering the identical work which claimant was required to do. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant was a window cleaner, employed by one Silverman; Silverman, in turn, contracted with McNamara to clean the windows of a school building of which McNamara was the custodian, and which McNamara was required to clean; Silverman had no insurance; McNamara had insurance covering the identical work which claimant was required to do. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Claim of Bederman v. McNamara, 243 A.D. 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 661 (Claim of Bederman v. McNamara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.