Claim of Bedder v. Gambardella

49 A.D.2d 968, 373 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11275
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 968 (Claim of Bedder v. Gambardella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Bedder v. Gambardella, 49 A.D.2d 968, 373 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed December 27, 1973, which found that claimant was an employee of the appellant and restored the case to the referee calendar for full development of the record as to claimant’s average weekly wage. Appellant owned and operated a car rental business which supplied automobiles, with or without drivers, principally to funeral establishments. Claimant had driven vehicles owned by appellant in funerals for three weeks prior to his injury. Appellant contends that claimant was an independent contractor rather than an employee. It is well settled that various factors such as the right to control the work, the furnishing of equipment, the right to fire and the relative nature of the [969]*969work "are relevant in determining whether an employment exists, it being possible often to establish the relationship on the basis of one of these elements alone” (Matter of Bianculli v Times Sq. Stores, 34 AD2d 696, 697). In the present case the record establishes that the equipment, namely the vehicles, were supplied by appellant for operation by claimant for customers to whom he was sent by appellant. The record further establishes that in addition to his duties as a driver, claimant helped in washing cars and cleaning ash trays and the interiors of vehicles, and that claimant maintained a locker on the premises of appellant. There was also evidence that claimant was paid $75 per week rather than being paid on a per job basis. This evidence is sufficiently substantial to support the board’s finding that an employer-employee relationship existed, and, therefore, the decision of the board must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Greenblott, J. P., Koreman, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pappas v. Greek Archdiocese of North & South America
178 A.D.2d 104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Claim of the Estate of Scott v. R. M. Stevenson Motors, Inc.
127 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Stone v. A.L.S. Construction Co.
108 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Lindenhurst Green & White Corp.
101 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Claim of Ziegler v. Fillmore Car Service, Inc.
83 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Claim of Brown v. Time, Inc.
71 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Wittenstein v. Fugazy Continental Corp.
59 A.D.2d 249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 968, 373 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-bedder-v-gambardella-nyappdiv-1975.