Claim of Beckstead v. Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Beckstead v. Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'n

263 A.D. 769, 30 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 769 (Claim of Beckstead v. Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Beckstead v. Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'n, 263 A.D. 769, 30 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by claimant in a compensation case. The decision denying compensation is not supported by the evidence. The proof indicates claimant was injured while driving a truck. The medical proof shows causal relation. There is no evidence to the contrary. Decision reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, and matter remitted. HB1, P. J., Crapser and Foster, JJ., concur; Bliss and Schenck, JJ., dissent on the ground that there was a clear question of fact as to the happening of the accident, and on the further ground that the record shows that this claimant had a previous back condition and had consulted a physician for it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by claimant in a compensation case. The decision denying compensation is not supported by the evidence. The proof indicates claimant was injured while driving a truck. The medical proof shows causal relation. There is no evidence to the contrary. Decision reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, and matter remitted. HB1, P. J., Crapser and Foster, JJ., concur; Bliss and Schenck, JJ., dissent on the ground that there was a clear question of fact as to the happening of the accident, and on the further ground that the record shows that this claimant had a previous back condition and had consulted a physician for it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 769, 30 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-beckstead-v-dairymens-league-co-operative-assn-nyappdiv-1941.