Claim of Bauman v. Chili Furniture & Appliances, Inc.
452 N.E.2d 1254, 59 N.Y.2d 859, 465 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3199
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice T. Paul Kane at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 974, 976).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Bauman v. Chili Furniture & Appliances, Inc., 452 N.E.2d 1254, 59 N.Y.2d 859, 465 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3199 (N.Y. 1983).
452 N.E.2d 1254 (Claim of Bauman v. Chili Furniture & Appliances, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Sartwell v. Hercules, Inc.
262 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Claim of Kane v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.
140 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)