Claim of Barry v. Arthur J. Barry, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Barry v. Arthur J. Barry, Inc.

282 A.D. 1088, 126 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1088 (Claim of Barry v. Arthur J. Barry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Barry v. Arthur J. Barry, Inc., 282 A.D. 1088, 126 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in a death case. Decedent underwent a hernia operation which was coneededly made necessary by an occupational injury. The only question is whether his death was due to a blood clot as a result of the operation or whether it was due to coronary thrombosis unrelated to the operation. While the medical evidence was in conflict, there was ample evidence to support the board’s finding that the decedent died of a pulmonary embolism which was due to the operation. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in a death case. Decedent underwent a hernia operation which was coneededly made necessary by an occupational injury. The only question is whether his death was due to a blood clot as a result of the operation or whether it was due to coronary thrombosis unrelated to the operation. While the medical evidence was in conflict, there was ample evidence to support the board’s finding that the decedent died of a pulmonary embolism which was due to the operation. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1088, 126 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-barry-v-arthur-j-barry-inc-nyappdiv-1953.