Claim of Balsamo v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Balsamo v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

234 A.D. 809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 809 (Claim of Balsamo v. Commercial Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Balsamo v. Commercial Casualty Insurance, 234 A.D. 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Award against the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company reversed and the ease remitted for further proof tending to show whether or not the employment in which the claimant was injured was incidental to the business being carried on by Zarcone and Potter, with costs to the appellant against the State Industrial Board to abide the event. All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes to affirm the award against the employers and the insurance carrier.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award against the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company reversed and the ease remitted for further proof tending to show whether or not the employment in which the claimant was injured was incidental to the business being carried on by Zarcone and Potter, with costs to the appellant against the State Industrial Board to abide the event. All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes to affirm the award against the employers and the insurance carrier.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-balsamo-v-commercial-casualty-insurance-nyappdiv-1931.