Claim of Ball v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Ball v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

43 A.D.2d 606, 349 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3248

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 606 (Claim of Ball v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Ball v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 43 A.D.2d 606, 349 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed March 23, 1972 and its amended decision of October 17, 1972, winch affirmed the Referee’s discharge of the Special Fund for Reopened Cases. Decision affirmed, with costs to Special Fund for Reopened Cases (see Matter of Schwartz v. Tour Baking Go., 20 A D 2d 422). Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed March 23, 1972 and its amended decision of October 17, 1972, winch affirmed the Referee’s discharge of the Special Fund for Reopened Cases. Decision affirmed, with costs to Special Fund for Reopened Cases (see Matter of Schwartz v. Tour Baking Go., 20 A D 2d 422). Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 606, 349 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ball-v-niagara-mohawk-power-corp-nyappdiv-1973.