Claim of Baldassari v. Greenwich Mills Co.

65 A.D.2d 839, 409 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13739
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 A.D.2d 839 (Claim of Baldassari v. Greenwich Mills Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Baldassari v. Greenwich Mills Co., 65 A.D.2d 839, 409 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 6, 1977. The board, in reversing the referee, found that the claimant’s decedent’s death was not causally related to the work effort in which he was employed. The instant [840]*840case hinges on conflicting medical testimony. The treating physician testified that in his opinion decedent’s unusual work effort caused the death by a myocardial infarction. Doctor Cutler testified that from his review of the records, the decedent died from intestinal obstruction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, acute pancreatitis and liver disease. He further testified that a myocardial infarction was never established. Doctor Fischl, an impartial specialist, testified that in his opinion the patient died as the result of previous abdominal disease unrelated to his work and that there was no evidence of myocardial infarction. Such medical opinions create issues of fact for the board to resolve and, if supported by substantial evidence, the board’s determination must be affirmed by this court (Matter of Manbeck v Manbeck Mach. Co., 54 AD2d 816). The testimony of Doctor Cutler and Doctor Fischl provided substantial evidence to support the board’s determination that the decedent’s death was not causally related to the work in which he was engaged and the cause of death was not a myocardial infarction. We therefore affirm the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Nizich v. Robert F. Barreca, Inc.
86 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Claim of Murtagh v. St. Theresa's Nursing Home, Inc.
84 A.D.2d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 A.D.2d 839, 409 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-baldassari-v-greenwich-mills-co-nyappdiv-1978.