Claim of Bak v. N. Kotok Fish Distributor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Bak v. N. Kotok Fish Distributor

261 A.D. 862, 24 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7805

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 862 (Claim of Bak v. N. Kotok Fish Distributor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Bak v. N. Kotok Fish Distributor, 261 A.D. 862, 24 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from an award for death benefits made by the State Industrial Board pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The deceased was employed as an outside and inside worker. On the 'day in question during the forenoon decedent was driving a truck outside where it was very warm. He later was compelled to work in the employer’s warehouse where there was ice and water and fish and to work at a greatly changed temperature. He developed chills and became sick and had to go home. This happened on August tenth. He died of pneumonia on August fifteenth without ever recovering. The evidence supports the award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from an award for death benefits made by the State Industrial Board pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The deceased was employed as an outside and inside worker. On the 'day in question during the forenoon decedent was driving a truck outside where it was very warm. He later was compelled to work in the employer’s warehouse where there was ice and water and fish and to work at a greatly changed temperature. He developed chills and became sick and had to go home. This happened on August tenth. He died of pneumonia on August fifteenth without ever recovering. The evidence supports the award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 862, 24 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-bak-v-n-kotok-fish-distributor-nyappdiv-1941.