Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n

Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n

267 A.D. 840, 47 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 266 A.D. 645 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1944·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. [See 266 App. Div. 645.] Hill, P. J., Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n, 267 A.D. 840, 47 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 840 (Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n
266 A.D. 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)