Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n
267 A.D. 840, 47 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 12, 1944
StatusPublished
This text of 267 A.D. 840 (Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n, 267 A.D. 840, 47 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. [See 266 App. Div. 645.] Hill, P. J., Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n
266 A.D. 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
267 A.D. 840, 47 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-bach-v-hampden-sales-assn-nyappdiv-1944.