Claim of Ayers v. Tioga County Sheriff's Department

240 A.D.2d 819, 658 N.Y.S.2d 533
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 12, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 819 (Claim of Ayers v. Tioga County Sheriff's Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Ayers v. Tioga County Sheriff's Department, 240 A.D.2d 819, 658 N.Y.S.2d 533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 2, 1995, which ruled that the death of claimant’s decedent arose out of his employment and awarded claimant workers’ compensation death benefits.

After decedent died at home as a result of cardiac arrhythmia, claimant, decedent’s wife, filed a claim for workers’ compensation death benefits. After a hearing, the Workers’ Compensation Board found that decedent’s death was causally related to stress engendered by his job as the Sheriff of Tioga County and awarded claimant death benefits. We find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Testimony at the hearing established that during the three months prior to his death, decedent became increasingly irritable due to job-related stress arising from, among other things, numer[820]*820ous pending lawsuits, some of which named him personally, and frustration at not being able to perform his duties due to political controversy. Claimant’s medical experts, who reviewed various job-related stresses in decedent’s life, testified that the stress experienced by decedent was a cause of his cardiac arrhythmia. Under these circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that decedent’s death was causally related to his employment (see, Matter of Rock v Sullivan County Sheriff’s Dept., 199 AD2d 659) despite decedent’s history of hypertension and arteriosclerosis (see generally, Matter of Kroeger v New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd., 222 AD2d 912, lv denied 88 NY2d 801).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Albert v. Miracle Makers of Bedford Stuyvesant HFDC, Inc.
13 A.D.3d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Claim of Loftus v. New York News
279 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Claim of Joslyn v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department
267 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Claim of Geed v. Sullivan County Sheriff's Department
266 A.D.2d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Gedon v. University Medical Residents Services, P. C.
252 A.D.2d 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D.2d 819, 658 N.Y.S.2d 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ayers-v-tioga-county-sheriffs-department-nyappdiv-1997.