Claim of Avery v. City or Middletown
This text of 305 N.E.2d 492 (Claim of Avery v. City or Middletown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order reversed, with costs against the respondent city, on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division, the determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board vacated, and the Referee’s decision reinstated.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bubke, Gabrielli and J ones. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion in which Judges Bbeitel and Wachtleb concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 N.E.2d 492, 33 N.Y.2d 771, 350 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-avery-v-city-or-middletown-ny-1973.