Claim of Arthur v. H. F. J. Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Arthur v. H. F. J. Construction Corp.

60 A.D.2d 720, 401 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14753

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 720 (Claim of Arthur v. H. F. J. Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Arthur v. H. F. J. Construction Corp., 60 A.D.2d 720, 401 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed August 5, 1976, as amended by decision filed October 8, 1976, and February 9, 1977, which determined that claimants had sustained compensable injuries and that appellant was the employer when the injuries were sustained. The board found that: "Claimants were employees of H.F.J. Construction when the accident occurred and not employees per se of the Joint Venture.” Substantial evidence supports the decision of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs against appellants. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed August 5, 1976, as amended by decision filed October 8, 1976, and February 9, 1977, which determined that claimants had sustained compensable injuries and that appellant was the employer when the injuries were sustained. The board found that: "Claimants were employees of H.F.J. Construction when the accident occurred and not employees per se of the Joint Venture.” Substantial evidence supports the decision of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs against appellants. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 720, 401 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-arthur-v-h-f-j-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1977.