Claim of Arner v. Manhattan Spring & Couch Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 924 (Claim of Arner v. Manhattan Spring & Couch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against the appellants. Rhodes, MeNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Crapser, J., dissent and vote to reverse the award and to remit matter to the State Industrial Board for an award against the employer and the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, insurance carrier, on the authority of Rose Inn Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. (258 N. Y. 51).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-arner-v-manhattan-spring-couch-co-nyappdiv-1933.