Claim of Arner v. Manhattan Spring & Couch Co.
240 A.D. 924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against the appellants. Rhodes, MeNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Crapser, J., dissent and vote to reverse the award and to remit matter to the State Industrial Board for an award against the employer and the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, insurance carrier, on the authority of Rose Inn Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. (258 N. Y. 51).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Arner v. Manhattan Spring & Couch Co., 240 A.D. 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 924 (Claim of Arner v. Manhattan Spring & Couch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rose Inn Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance
179 N.E. 256 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)