Claim of Angelo v. Triangle Broom & Brush Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Angelo v. Triangle Broom & Brush Co.

243 A.D. 838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 838 (Claim of Angelo v. Triangle Broom & Brush Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Angelo v. Triangle Broom & Brush Co., 243 A.D. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The question is of coverage. The policy was issued to a copartnersMp. One of the partners retired and the remaining partner continued the business under the same name at the same place. Claimant was injured wMle employed by the business being conducted by the remaining partner. (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 252 N. Y. 518.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The question is of coverage. The policy was issued to a copartnersMp. One of the partners retired and the remaining partner continued the business under the same name at the same place. Claimant was injured wMle employed by the business being conducted by the remaining partner. (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 252 N. Y. 518.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-angelo-v-triangle-broom-brush-co-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack