Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Amoroso v. Tubular & Cast Products Manufacturing Co.

Claim of Amoroso v. Tubular & Cast Products Manufacturing Co.

194 N.E.2d 694, 13 N.Y.2d 992
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 21, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 194 N.E.2d 694 (Claim of Amoroso v. Tubular & Cast Products Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Amoroso v. Tubular & Cast Products Manufacturing Co., 194 N.E.2d 694, 13 N.Y.2d 992 (N.Y. 1963).

Opinions

Order affirmed, without costs. In our view there was no substantial evidence before the board upon which an award could be legally predicated. (See Matter of Miller v. National Cabinet Co., 8 N Y 2d 277; Matter of Riehl v. Town of Amherst, 308 N. Y. 212.)

Concur: Judges Fuld, Van Voobhis, Bubke and Scileppi. Judge Fosteb dissents in the following opinion in which Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Dye concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Murphy v. New York State Cts.
2022 NY Slip Op 00087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Bolger v. Chris Anderson Roofing Co., Inc.
271 A.2d 451 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.E.2d 694, 13 N.Y.2d 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-amoroso-v-tubular-cast-products-manufacturing-co-ny-1963.