Claim for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law of Priestley v. H. Hentz & Co.
234 A.D. 804
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board noticed on November 15, 1930.
Decision affirmed, on the authority of Harby v. Marwell Bros., Inc. (203 App. Div. 525; affd., 235 N. Y. 504); Matter of Jakeway v. Bauer Co. (218 App. Div. 302); Davidson v. Pansy Waist Co. (240 N. Y. 584). All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents, with an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law of Priestley v. H. Hentz & Co., 234 A.D. 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
234 A.D. 804 (Claim for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law of Priestley v. H. Hentz & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Claim of Cowles
254 A.D. 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Claim of Turner v. Cathedral Publishing Co.
243 A.D. 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)