Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Claiborne v. State

Claiborne v. State

877 S.W.2d 936, 317 Ark. 578, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 430
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJuly 11, 1994
DocketCR 94-661
StatusPublished

This text of 877 S.W.2d 936 (Claiborne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claiborne v. State, 877 S.W.2d 936, 317 Ark. 578, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 430 (Ark. 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, John Claiborne, by his attorney, Clarence Walden Cash, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney accepts full responsibility and admits that the record was tendered late due to his error.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 S.W.2d 936, 317 Ark. 578, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claiborne-v-state-ark-1994.