Claiborne v. Frazier

4 S.C.L. 47
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

The court

granted the motion. The question arises on a rule . of court, which requires personal notice to the party, and not the attorney. Where a party is resident out of the State, notice cannot properly be served on him, and he cannot be considered within the scope of the rule ; at any rate, so far within it as to make it incumbent on him to attend personally. Whether be may not be required to answer interrogatories properly administered, under a commission, it is not now necessary to decide.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claiborne v. Frazier, 4 S.C.L. 47 (S.C. 1806).

4 S.C.L. 47 (Claiborne v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.