Clagett v. Crawford
This text of 12 G. & J. 275 (Clagett v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The order of the Chancellor of 16th November, 1840, appealed from in this case, is not a final decree, or in the nature of a final decree, so as to authorise an appeal since the act of 1830, chap. 185. The order does not adjudicate any right between the parties. It is preparatory only, and directs the auditor to state an account, with a view to a future decree, and that such account should be stated, in conformity with the then existing views of the Chancellor, various opinions are expressed in the order and suggested to the auditor. But nothing has been done by the Chancellor which settles any right, or from which he might not have departed in any future stage of the cause, although the auditor may have reported in strict compliance with the Chancellor’s views as indicated by the order; still, it was in the Chancellor’s power to overrule the account, and to have ordered another account to have been stated upon different principles, or even to have dismissed the petition, if in his judgment justice required it. The appeal is accordingly dism.ssed.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 G. & J. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clagett-v-crawford-md-1841.