Claflin v. New York Standard Watch Co.
This text of 23 N.Y.S. 324 (Claflin v. New York Standard Watch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case seems to have been carefully tried, and the result arrived at warranted by the evidence. The counsel had the right to refer to the pleadings during the progress of the trial, as they are always before the court and jury. Rowe v. Comley, 1 City Ct. R. 466, 2 Civil Proc. R. 424, 427. We have examined the numerous exceptions, and find them without merit. On the facts as found by the jury, the verdict rendered by them is right, and the judgment entered thereon, and the order denying the motion for a new trial, must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 N.Y.S. 324, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claflin-v-new-york-standard-watch-co-nynyccityct-1893.