Claflin v. Hawes
8 Mass. 261
This text of 8 Mass. 261 (Claflin v. Hawes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claflin v. Hawes, 8 Mass. 261 (Mass. 1811).
Opinion
This matter ought to have been adjusted at the bar. But as this has not been done, let judgment be entered for the plaintiff on the fifth count, to which the plea of tender was made,
[A profert in Court was unnecessary, and should have been regarded as surplusage. 2 Kent Comm. 508, Lamb vs. Lathrop, 13 Wend. 95.—Bro. Touts temps prist, plac. 31. — Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gilpatrick v. Ricker
19 A. 165 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1889)
Gilkeson v. Smith
15 W. Va. 44 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1879)
Storer v. McGaw
93 Mass. 527 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1866)
Reed v. Woodman
17 Me. 43 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1840)
Bignell v. Forrest
2 Johns. 482 (New York Supreme Court, 1807)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Mass. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claflin-v-hawes-mass-1811.