Claflin v. Hawes
8 Mass. 261
Opinion
This matter ought to have been adjusted at the bar. But as this has not been done, let judgment be entered for the plaintiff on the fifth count, to which the plea of tender was made,
[A profert in Court was unnecessary, and should have been regarded as surplusage. 2 Kent Comm. 508, Lamb vs. Lathrop, 13 Wend. 95.—Bro. Touts temps prist, plac. 31. — Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claflin v. Hawes, 8 Mass. 261 (Mass. 1811).
8 Mass. 261 (Claflin v. Hawes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilpatrick v. Ricker
19 A. 165 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1889)
Gilkeson v. Smith
15 W. Va. 44 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1879)
Storer v. McGaw
93 Mass. 527 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1866)
Reed v. Woodman
17 Me. 43 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1840)
Bignell v. Forrest
2 Johns. 482 (New York Supreme Court, 1807)