Claflin v. Batchelder

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Claflin v. Batchelder

17 A. 1060, 65 N.H. 29

DecidedDecember 5, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A. 1060 (Claflin v. Batchelder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claflin v. Batchelder, 17 A. 1060, 65 N.H. 29 (N.H. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.

The deed of August 10, 1885, was made in pursuance of a previous agreement, which had been fully performed on the part of the defendant. The defendant was a bona fide purchaser. The fact is found that the conveyance was made in good faith, upon a valuable consideration, and with no notice of the existence of any creditors of the grantor. Such a sale is valid against everybody.

Judgment for the defendant.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.

The deed of August 10, 1885, was made in pursuance of a previous agreement, which had been fully performed on the part of the defendant. The defendant was a bona fide purchaser. The fact is found that the conveyance was made in good faith, upon a valuable consideration, and with no notice of the existence of any creditors of the grantor. Such a sale is valid against everybody.

Judgment for the defendant.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A. 1060, 65 N.H. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claflin-v-batchelder-nh-1888.