Clack v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Clack v. State

161 So. 265, 26 Ala. App. 417, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 113

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 7, 1935

Docket5 Div. 962.

StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 265 (Clack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clack v. State, 161 So. 265, 26 Ala. App. 417, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 113 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The indictment in the case is in all things regular and properly charges the offense of which the defendant was convicted.

*266 The bill of exceptions fails to disclose any exceptions of merit.

Refused charge 1, being the only charge refused to defendant, is elliptical, and for that reason was properly refused.

We And no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI