Claborn v. State
This text of 104 So. 875 (Claborn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The indictment contained two counts. Count 1 charged that the defendant distilled, made, op manufactured alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or .mixed beverages, a part of which was alcohol. Count 2 charged in proper form and substance the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages. There was a general verdict of guilty returned against this appellant.
The record contains certain demurrers to the indictment, but no ruling of the court upon the demurrers appears, nor is there any exception to the failure or refusal of the court to rule upon the demurrers. There is nothing presented for review in this connection.
There is no bill of exceptions.' The cause is here submitted upon the record. In the absence of a hill of exception the ruling of the court upon motion for new trial cannot he considered, nor can the court’s action in refusing the several written charges requested by defendant be reviewed.
The record proper appears regular. Let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 So. 875, 21 Ala. App. 29, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claborn-v-state-alactapp-1925.