Claar v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Claar v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co.

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 594

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 1913·No. No. 13401·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason that the errors in the charge of the court of common pleas to the jury are not found by this court to have been prejudicial, this court finding that substantial justice has been done between the parties.

Johnson, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason that the errors in the charge of the court of common pleas to the jury are not found by this court to have been prejudicial, this court finding that substantial justice has been done between the parties.

Johnson, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Claar v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co., 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 594 (Ohio 1913).

Pincite

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 594 (Claar v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.