C.L. Whiteside Construction Co. v. Johnson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

C.L. Whiteside Construction Co. v. Johnson

438 So. 2d 1081, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22706

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 19, 1983

DocketNo. AR-189

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 So. 2d 1081 (C.L. Whiteside Construction Co. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C.L. Whiteside Construction Co. v. Johnson, 438 So. 2d 1081, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22706 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal the order of the deputy commissioner awarding claimant wage loss benefits for the months of May, June, July and August, 1982, and assessing penalties against the employer/carrier for those same months. The order also directed the employer/carrier to reinstitute rehabilitation efforts, both as to job placement and [1082]*1082reeducation of claimant. That portion of the order has not been challenged.

We affirm the award of wage loss benefits and the assessment of penalties for June, July and August. However, the record indicates that the employer/carrier timely controverted the claim for wage loss for May. Therefore, we reverse the assessment of penalties for the late payment of May wage loss benefits, and the deputy commissioner’s order is amended to that extent.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal the order of the deputy commissioner awarding claimant wage loss benefits for the months of May, June, July and August, 1982, and assessing penalties against the employer/carrier for those same months. The order also directed the employer/carrier to reinstitute rehabilitation efforts, both as to job placement and [1082]*1082reeducation of claimant. That portion of the order has not been challenged.

We affirm the award of wage loss benefits and the assessment of penalties for June, July and August. However, the record indicates that the employer/carrier timely controverted the claim for wage loss for May. Therefore, we reverse the assessment of penalties for the late payment of May wage loss benefits, and the deputy commissioner’s order is amended to that extent.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 So. 2d 1081, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cl-whiteside-construction-co-v-johnson-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack