C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. Jefferson Sessions

904 F.3d 642

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2018·No. 16-73801·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 19 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

C.J.L.G., A JUVENILE MALE, No. 16-73801

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-838-888

v. ORDER JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 19 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

C.J.L.G., A JUVENILE MALE, No. 16-73801

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-838-888

v. ORDER JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. Jefferson Sessions, 904 F.3d 642 (9th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

904 F.3d 642 (C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

923 F.3d 622 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)

908 F.3d 1157 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)