C.J.H. v. State

164 So. 3d 72, 2015 WL 2078564
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 6, 2015
DocketNo. 2D14-1169
StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 72 (C.J.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C.J.H. v. State, 164 So. 3d 72, 2015 WL 2078564 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

C.J.H. challenges his disposition and restitution orders. We affirm the disposition order without comment. But because the restitution order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence we reverse for a new restitution hearing.1 See Fernandez v. State, 98 So.3d 730, 731-32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fernandez v. State
98 So. 3d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 3d 72, 2015 WL 2078564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cjh-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.