Civis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 24, 2026·No. 24-0224V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-224V

MARLENE CIVIS, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: March 9, 2026 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Austin Joel Egan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On February 14, 2024, Marlene Civis filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered to her on January 26, 2022. Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was received in the United States, she suffered sequela of her injury for more than six months, and neither Petitioner nor any other party has ever received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related injury. Id. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 17, 2025, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. ECF No. 25. On March 9, 2026, Respondent filed a Proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in pain and suffering and $1,807.32 in past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

at 2, ECF No. 29. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. See id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $71,807.32 for pain and suffering and past unreimbursable expenses to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

)

MARLENE CIVIS, )

)

Petitioner, )

) No. 24-224V

v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

)

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On February 14, 2024, Marlene Civis (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation

(“petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -

34, as amended (“Act”). She alleged that she sustained a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following receipt of an

influenza vaccine administered on January 26, 2022. See Petition. On December 3, 2025, the

Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed his Amended Vaccine Rule 4(c)

Report advising that, in light of Chief Special Master Corcoran’s Findings of Fact that petitioner

experienced ongoing shoulder pain for more than six months, and the medical evidence

submitted in this case, respondent did not dispute that petitioner had satisfied all legal

prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. ECF No. 23. On December 17, 2025,

Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to

compensation for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 25.

I. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded

the following:

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in pain and suffering.

See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that he incurred past unreimbursable expenses

related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past

unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,807.32. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B).

Petitioner agrees.

These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through

a lump sum payment, as described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision

and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1

A lump sum payment of $71,807.32 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, Marlene Civis.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General

JONATHAN D. GUYNN Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief.

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

TRACI R. PATTON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ AUSTIN J. EGAN Austin J. Egan Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 451-7479 Austin.J.Egan@usdoj.gov

Date: March 9, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that today, March 9, 2026, a copy of the foregoing pleading was served by

electronic mail to Maximillian Muller at max@mullerbrazil.com.

/s/ Austin J. Egan

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2026).

Civis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Civis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3501
44 U.S.C. § 3501