Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Town of Hempstead

284 A.D.2d 365, 725 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6044

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 365 (Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Town of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Town of Hempstead, 284 A.D.2d 365, 725 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated July 31, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In opposition to the plaintiffs prima facie showing that the defendant breached the collective bargaining agreement and related agreements, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated July 31, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In opposition to the plaintiffs prima facie showing that the defendant breached the collective bargaining agreement and related agreements, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 365, 725 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/civil-service-employees-assn-v-town-of-hempstead-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack