Cives Corp. v. William Corbitt, Inc.
This text of 63 A.D.2d 825 (Cives Corp. v. William Corbitt, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant, a [826]*826New Jersey corporation, appeals from a denial of its motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 327 upon the ground of forum non conveniens. The action is for loss of part of a shipment of steel products being transported for hire by defendant from Winchester, Virginia, to Mineral, Virginia. Although plaintiff, a corporation engaged in furnishing fabricated structural steel, was incorporated in Delaware, its principal place of business and its officers are located in Onondaga County, New York. Under the circumstances we cannot say that Special Term abused its discretion in denying the motion. "Plaintiffs choice of forum should not be disturbed unless there are compelling reasons to do so. (Olympic Corp. v Societe Generale, 462 F2d 376, 378.) 'Inconvenient forum’ does not provide a ticket out of town for every foreign corporation.” (Traub v Robertson-Amer. Corp., 82 Misc 2d 222, 231-232; Silver v Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 NY2d 356.) (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—dismiss complaint.) Present—Marsh, P.J., Moule, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 A.D.2d 825, 406 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cives-corp-v-william-corbitt-inc-nyappdiv-1978.