Civello v. City of New York

255 A.D.2d 353, 679 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11815
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 1998·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In an action to [354] recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), entered November 24, 1997, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the City of New York.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint, since the most recent “Big Apple” map on file with the Department of Transportation of the respondent, City of New York, did not show a defect at the location where the plaintiff Louis Civello allegedly fell (see, Katz v City of New York, 87 NY2d 241). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civello v. City of New York, 255 A.D.2d 353, 679 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 353 (Civello v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carvajal v. City of New York
7 Misc. 3d 509 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)
Kempler v. City of New York
272 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Dallal v. City of New York
257 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)