Civello v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Civello v. City of New York

255 A.D.2d 353, 679 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11815

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 255 A.D.2d 353 (Civello v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Civello v. City of New York, 255 A.D.2d 353, 679 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to [354]*354recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), entered November 24, 1997, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the City of New York.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint, since the most recent “Big Apple” map on file with the Department of Transportation of the respondent, City of New York, did not show a defect at the location where the plaintiff Louis Civello allegedly fell (see, Katz v City of New York, 87 NY2d 241). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to [354]*354recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), entered November 24, 1997, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the City of New York.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint, since the most recent “Big Apple” map on file with the Department of Transportation of the respondent, City of New York, did not show a defect at the location where the plaintiff Louis Civello allegedly fell (see, Katz v City of New York, 87 NY2d 241). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 353, 679 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/civello-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack