City of Zanesville v. Stotts

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 557
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 29, 1913
DocketNo. 13086
StatusPublished

This text of 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 557 (City of Zanesville v. Stotts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Zanesville v. Stotts, 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 557 (Ohio 1913).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed.

The court finds that the trial court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant below ■ to direct a verdict at the’ close of the plaintiff’s evidence, but that, inasmuch as the defendant did not. renew the motion at the. close of all the testimony, the circuit court did not err in refusing to enter judgment for the said city of Zanesville, but the court further finds on the conceded facts that the circuit court did err in refusing to reverse the judgment and remand the case of a new trial.

And coming now to render the judgment that the circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged' that the judgments of the courts below be reversed and that this cause be remanded to the court of common pleas for further pro[558]*558ceedings according to law.

Sitauck, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-zanesville-v-stotts-ohio-1913.