City of Worcester v. Town of Milford

204 N.E.2d 431, 348 Mass. 786
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 29, 1965·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff seeks recovery from the defendant under G. L. e. 117, § 14, as amended through St. 1939, c. 39, § 1, for hospital care furnished to persons whose settlement was in Milford. The case was tried in the Superior Court on a statement of agreed facts. The amount recoverable by the plaintiff in this action is not subject to the limitation contained in G. L. c. 117, § 24A. The case is controlled by Worcester v. Charlton, 336 Mass. 525. The removal of the limitation from G. L. c. 117, § 24, and the insertion of it in § 24A, as accomplished by St. 1959, e. 584, in no way derogates from the holding in Worcester v. Charlton, supra. The finding, construed as an order for judgment for the defendant, is reversed. Judgment for the plaintiff is to be entered in the Superior Court for $680.44 on count 1, $89.92 on count 2, and $60.17 on count 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Worcester v. Town of Milford, 204 N.E.2d 431, 348 Mass. 786 (Mass. 1965).

204 N.E.2d 431 (City of Worcester v. Town of Milford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Worcester v. Town of Charlton
146 N.E.2d 675 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1957)