City of Wooster v. Evans

Ohio Supreme Court

City of Wooster v. Evans

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 504

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1915·No. No. 14615·Published

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is. hereby, affirmed, for the reason that this court holds, on the authority of Tea Co. v. Tippecanoe, 85 Ohio St., 120, that in view of the guaranties of the Bill of Rights, Sections 3673 and 3676 of the General Code cannot be interpreted to authorize a license fee on transient dealers, of the character described in the affidavit in this case, and [505]*505making such offenses as the defendant in error was charged with in that affidavit punishable.

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, Donahue, Newman and Jones, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is. hereby, affirmed, for the reason that this court holds, on the authority of Tea Co. v. Tippecanoe, 85 Ohio St., 120, that in view of the guaranties of the Bill of Rights, Sections 3673 and 3676 of the General Code cannot be interpreted to authorize a license fee on transient dealers, of the character described in the affidavit in this case, and [505]*505making such offenses as the defendant in error was charged with in that affidavit punishable.

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, Donahue, Newman and Jones, JJ., concur.

City of Wooster v. Evans, 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 504 (Ohio 1915).

Pincite

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 504 (City of Wooster v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.