City of Wooster v. Evans
This text of 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 504 (City of Wooster v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is. hereby, affirmed, for the reason that this court holds, on the authority of Tea Co. v. Tippecanoe, 85 Ohio St., 120, that in view of the guaranties of the Bill of Rights, Sections 3673 and 3676 of the General Code cannot be interpreted to authorize a license fee on transient dealers, of the character described in the affidavit in this case, and [505]*505making such offenses as the defendant in error was charged with in that affidavit punishable.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-wooster-v-evans-ohio-1915.