City of Winston-Salem v. Rice
192 S.E.2d 835, 282 N.C. 425, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 973
This text of 192 S.E.2d 835 (City of Winston-Salem v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Winston-Salem v. Rice, 192 S.E.2d 835, 282 N.C. 425, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 973 (N.C. 1972).
Opinion
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
v.
Letitia C. RICE.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Allan R. Gitter, Roddey M. Ligon, Jr., for plaintiff.
Deal, Hutchins & Minor, William Kearns Davis, for defendant.
Petition for writ of certiorari by the defendant to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 192 S.E. 2d 9. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Winston-Salem v. Rice
192 S.E.2d 9 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
192 S.E.2d 835, 282 N.C. 425, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-winston-salem-v-rice-nc-1972.