City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.
25 Minn. 328, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 64
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal from an order allowing an amendment to the complaint. We do not think such an order appealable. If there be an abuse of discretion in granting such an order, it may be reviewed on appeal from the judgment, or from an order upon a motion for a new trial.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co., 25 Minn. 328, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 64 (Mich. 1878).
25 Minn. 328 (City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goode v. Adams Express Co.
192 Iowa 1164 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)
Stromme v. Rieck
125 N.W. 1021 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Bear v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.
141 F. 25 (Eighth Circuit, 1905)
Frisch v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
104 N.W. 228 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Hanley v. Board of County Commissioners
91 N.W. 756 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1902)