City of Wilmington v. Parsley
152 S.E. 925, 198 N.C. 821, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 502
Opinion
A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the decisions on the subject, and that no serious harm has come to the respondent in the particulars pointed out by his exceptions. Wade v. Highway Commissioners, 188 N. C., 210, 124 S. E., 193; Elks v. Commissioners, 179 N. C., 241, 102 S. E., 414.
The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Wilmington v. Parsley, 152 S.E. 925, 198 N.C. 821, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 502 (N.C. 1930).
152 S.E. 925 (City of Wilmington v. Parsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wade v. State Highway Commission
124 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Elks v. . Comrs.
102 S.E. 414 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
Elks v. Commissioners of Pitt County
179 N.C. 241 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)