City of Wilmington v. Parsley
This text of 152 S.E. 925 (City of Wilmington v. Parsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the decisions on the subject, and that no serious harm has come to the respondent in the particulars pointed out by his exceptions. Wade v. Highway Commissioners, 188 N. C., 210, 124 S. E., 193; Elks v. Commissioners, 179 N. C., 241, 102 S. E., 414.
The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 S.E. 925, 198 N.C. 821, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-wilmington-v-parsley-nc-1930.