City of Whitewater v. Stroder

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Whitewater v. Stroder

556 S.W.3d 658

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105926

StatusPublished

This text of 556 S.W.3d 658 (City of Whitewater v. Stroder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Whitewater v. Stroder, 556 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Nathan Stroder appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County of two violations of the *659municipal ordinances of Whitewater, Missouri for failing to connect his household water and sewer lines to the public water and sewer systems.

We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Nathan Stroder appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County of two violations of the *659municipal ordinances of Whitewater, Missouri for failing to connect his household water and sewer lines to the public water and sewer systems.

We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 S.W.3d 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-whitewater-v-stroder-moctapp-2018.