City of West Palm Beach v. Grimmett

136 So. 320, 102 Fla. 680
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 31, 1931·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *681 the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of West Palm Beach v. Grimmett, 136 So. 320, 102 Fla. 680 (Fla. 1931).

136 So. 320 (City of West Palm Beach v. Grimmett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of St. Petersburg v. Shannon
156 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Davis v. Provo City Corp.
265 P.2d 415 (Utah Supreme Court, 1953)
City of Miami v. Bethel
65 So. 2d 34 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
City of Avon Park v. Giddens
27 So. 2d 825 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)
Thigpen v. City of Miami
4 So. 2d 365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Barth v. City of Miami
197 So. 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Hoggard v. City of Richmond
200 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1939)
Swindal v. City of Jacksonville
161 So. 383 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)