City of Ventnor v. Fulmer

117 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 660, 8 Stock. 660, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 346
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 28, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black,, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Ventnor v. Fulmer, 117 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 660, 8 Stock. 660, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 346 (N.J. 1922).

117 A. 925 (City of Ventnor v. Fulmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melucci v. Eagan
1 A.2d 452 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)