City of Ventnor v. Fulmer

117 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 660, 8 Stock. 660, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 346
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 28, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 A. 925 (City of Ventnor v. Fulmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Ventnor v. Fulmer, 117 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 660, 8 Stock. 660, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 346 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black,, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melucci v. Eagan
1 A.2d 452 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 A. 925, 93 N.J. Eq. 660, 8 Stock. 660, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-ventnor-v-fulmer-nj-1922.