City of Uvalde v. Spier

Fifth Circuit

City of Uvalde v. Spier

91 F. 594, 33 C.C.A. 501, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2056

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 17, 1899

DocketNo. 740

StatusPublished

This text of 91 F. 594 (City of Uvalde v. Spier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Uvalde v. Spier, 91 F. 594, 33 C.C.A. 501, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2056 (5th Cir. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case a jury was waived by stipulation in writing, and the cause was submitted to and tried by the court. A special finding of facts and conclusions of law were entered, and to the effect that the plaintiff below, defendant in error here, was an innocent purchaser for value and without notice, either in fact or in law, of any irregularity attending the issuance or disposition of the bonds in question. On' the facts as found, we agree with the trial judge, and his judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case a jury was waived by stipulation in writing, and the cause was submitted to and tried by the court. A special finding of facts and conclusions of law were entered, and to the effect that the plaintiff below, defendant in error here, was an innocent purchaser for value and without notice, either in fact or in law, of any irregularity attending the issuance or disposition of the bonds in question. On' the facts as found, we agree with the trial judge, and his judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 F. 594, 33 C.C.A. 501, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-uvalde-v-spier-ca5-1899.