City of Tuskegee v. Lacey
This text of 551 So. 2d 338 (City of Tuskegee v. Lacey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s final judgment in this cause, declaring the City of Tuskegee’s annexation ordinances 84-1, 84-2, and 86-23 invalid on the authority of City of Fultondale v. City of Birmingham, 507 So.2d 489 (Ala.1987), is affirmed. For the retroactive application of City of Fultondale, see City of Birmingham v. Blount County, 533 So.2d 534, 537 (Ala.1988). See, also, City of Birmingham v. Smith, 507 So.2d 1312 (Ala.1987).
The jurisdiction of the trial court to adjudicate all matters relating to the terms and conditions of its order of stay pending appeal is not affected by this Court’s judgment of affirmance.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 So. 2d 338, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 641, 1989 WL 122345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-tuskegee-v-lacey-ala-1989.