City of Tulsa v. Pender

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

City of Tulsa v. Pender

1944 OK 262, 154 P.2d 99, 194 Okla. 674, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 570

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 3, 1944

DocketNo. 31362.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1944 OK 262 (City of Tulsa v. Pender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Tulsa v. Pender, 1944 OK 262, 154 P.2d 99, 194 Okla. 674, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 570 (Okla. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

BAYLESS, J.

City of Tulsa, Okla., a municipal corporation, and certain of its officials appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county in favor of S. G. Pender. This is a companion case to No. 31397, City of Tulsa v. F. M. McMillan, 194 Okla. 672, 154 P. 2d 97 this day decided, and involves similar facts and issues of law. In fact, the substantial part of the evidence in this case is made up of the transcript in the McMillan Case.

What we said in the McMillan Case applies here and governs this appeal, and there is no occasion to repeat.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI