City of Tulsa v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

City of Tulsa v. Lynch

1943 OK 187, 145 P.2d 202, 193 Okla. 505, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 445

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 18, 1943

DocketNo. 30950.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1943 OK 187 (City of Tulsa v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Tulsa v. Lynch, 1943 OK 187, 145 P.2d 202, 193 Okla. 505, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 445 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVISON, J.

This case is in all essential respects identical with cause No. 30727, City of Tulsa v. Emmett Johnson et al., 193 Okla. 501, 145 P. 2d 198, this day decided. The disposition of the cause in the trial court corresponds to the disposition made by the trial court in cause No. 30727, supra, except that the money judgment was for a different amount. The issues presented to this court are the sa'me except that no cross-petition has been filed by the defendant in error, a distinction which is immaterial.

Our decision in cause No. 30727, supra, determines the issues in this appeal, and the opinion and syllabus in that case is adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case.

This cause is therefore reversed, with directions to enter judgment in favor of the defendant city.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVISON, J.

This case is in all essential respects identical with cause No. 30727, City of Tulsa v. Emmett Johnson et al., 193 Okla. 501, 145 P. 2d 198, this day decided. The disposition of the cause in the trial court corresponds to the disposition made by the trial court in cause No. 30727, supra, except that the money judgment was for a different amount. The issues presented to this court are the sa'me except that no cross-petition has been filed by the defendant in error, a distinction which is immaterial.

Our decision in cause No. 30727, supra, determines the issues in this appeal, and the opinion and syllabus in that case is adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case.

This cause is therefore reversed, with directions to enter judgment in favor of the defendant city.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1943 OK 187, 145 P.2d 202, 193 Okla. 505, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-tulsa-v-lynch-okla-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack