City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thorne Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thorne Co.

160 A.2d 131, 32 N.J. 256, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 201

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 25, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 160 A.2d 131 (City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thorne Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thorne Co., 160 A.2d 131, 32 N.J. 256, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 201 (N.J. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

We think it unnecessary to decide whether the individual commissioner had authority to institute the action or whether defendant may inquire into the question. We agree with the majority opinion of the Appellate Division that in any event the issue was eliminated by ratification. The question whether the 6 or 16 3'"ear statute of limitations applies need not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Eranois, Proctor, Hall and Sci-iettino—6.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI