City of Topeka v. Stahl
123 P. 739, 87 Kan. 294, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 132
Opinion
The petition for rehearing is denied, but to avoid a possible misapprehension it will be added that nothing in the opinion was intended as an intimation that the defendant would not be entitled «to a credit in an adjustment with the city for expenses necessarily incurred in other cases, similar to those referred to in the petition, but in which he did not succeed in obtaining judgments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Topeka v. Stahl, 123 P. 739, 87 Kan. 294, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 132 (kan 1912).
123 P. 739 (City of Topeka v. Stahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.